1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The proceedings of the deceased AD are taken over.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the defendant’s additional determination of the argument in this court as to this case as set forth in paragraph 2 below. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

In the same part, the defendant's "the defendant" in the first part of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to be the "D Trade Union".

In the first instance judgment, each "Defendant" in the first instance judgment No. 16 shall be raised to each "D Trade Union".

Part 32 of the judgment of the first instance is "(Article 45 of the Organization Convention)" (Article 38 (1) of the Organization Convention).

Part 3-5 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that "((one's regular bonus for physical training allowances) ± 243 hours ± (one's regular bonus for physical training allowances ± 243 hours)" is "((one's bonus for physical training allowances ± 243 hours)."

Part 38 of the first instance judgment "for the plaintiff" in Part 9 of the first instance judgment shall be "for the plaintiff (excluding AD)".

In addition, the second part of the judgment of the first instance shall add the following contents to the “Status of the Parties.”

3) On July 24, 2014, Plaintiff AD died on the instant lawsuit and jointly succeeded to the property of Plaintiff AF, AG, and AH, a sibling of AD (each share of 1/3), and the said Plaintiffs took over the instant lawsuit on September 14, 2018.

The following is added to the part of the judgment of the first instance. In addition, the defendant's 3,468,075 won, 3,468,075 won, 3,468,074 won, and 3,468,074 won to the plaintiff AF, who is a litigation attorney of AD, and 3,468,074 won, as the plaintiffs seek after the due date, it is reasonable for the defendant to dispute as to the existence or scope of the obligation from March 7, 2014 until February 17, 2017, and 6% per annum under the Commercial Act, which is the date of the judgment of the first instance to the date of full payment.