1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 18, 2009, the deceased B (CB; hereinafter “the deceased”) joined the Incheon Branch of the Korea Legal Aid Corporation (hereinafter “Seoul Branch”).

B. On November 11, 201, the Deceased complained of two copies during work and divided the horses into two parts, and sent them to a nearby hospital by Marins and scarcity and by the 119 first aid unit, and died on December 16, 201.

Persons who are direct death, intermediate events, and pre-stigious death are all brain-deads.

C. The deceased’s wife asserted that the deceased died from an occupational accident and claimed the payment of bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses. However, on February 1, 2012, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition to pay bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Plaintiff on the ground that “In light of the fact that, at the time of the death of the deceased, excessive work or sudden stress is not confirmed at the time of the death, and that the blood ties of the deceased’s disease is increased, it is determined that the cerebrovascular caused aggravation due to the natural progress of the existing individual disease, and thus, it is not related to the work.”

On the other hand, the Plaintiff filed a request for an examination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee, but was dismissed on May 2012, and filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee, but was dismissed on August 24, 2012.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Evidence No. 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion suffers much stress due to administrative work, such as legal counseling and the preparation of a budget request, the number of employees under his/her control decreased, and the number of employees under his/her control rapidly increased, thereby exceeding 30% of the number of daily work hours per week prior to the instant injury and injury, and the number of employees under his/her control exceeded 30% of the number of daily work hours per week prior to the instant injury and injury, and the civil petitioner on November 10 and November 10, 201.