logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.04.05 2017고단5352
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on August 9, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 16, 2017.

On November 05, 2017, at around 13:55, the Defendant, at the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul metropolitan floor, assaulted the police officer’s slope F, who belongs to the E District Police Station in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, with the report of 112 related to the domestic violence of her wife, with the desire to “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am you am, I am you am

After all, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Reporting on investigation (to hear statements by telephone from a victimized police officer);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the current status of accommodation of individuals and investigation reports (verification of repeated crimes);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant did not engage in the period of repeated crime and commits a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties. However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and is in profoundly against the defendant, the amount of damage is deposited, the defendant supports three children, and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered, and the punishment is determined as ordered by the order, taking into account all the various sentencing conditions specified in the records and trial process.

arrow