The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing);

A. The Defendant, at the time, operated safely without vehicle traffic or pedestrian traffic or without any signal, did not violate the signal, and there was a problem in the signal system, such as “four-dimensional signal signal signal sign” installed only on the sign board of the pedestrian signal signal at the scene of the instant case. Therefore, without considering such circumstance, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of violating the signal to turn to the left, even though the vehicle signal at the front line of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu is a straight line, and the Defendant was in violation of the signal to turn to the left.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below (amounting to KRW 60,00) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the court below's finding of facts is just, and there is no error in the misapprehension of facts, on the grounds that the defendant asserted that the defendant violated the signal as stated in the judgment of the court below, and that there is no vehicle traffic or pedestrian at the time, or there is a need to improve the future signal system.

B. Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as to the wrongful assertion of sentencing, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, in light of the background leading up to the violation of the signal of this case, and other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.