logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.11 2017나67959
구상금
Text

1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or replacement of a part of the reasons for the judgment as follows.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, "At the time of entering into the contract of this case" is "the receipt of a loan".

On the third 4th th th son of the first instance judgment, "the plaintiff" is "the defendant company" as "the plaintiff."

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court "for the Defendant Company, including the amount of KRW 77 million in advance" shall be added next to "the Defendant Company."

Part 5, 11 of the judgment of the first instance court is "for all legitimate use" as "for all construction costs".

3-3 of pages 6 through 8-3 of the judgment of the first instance;

(a) Paragraph (1) of this Article shall be amended to:

1) The contract of this case was lawfully terminated and the contract of this case was terminated and the contract of this case was terminated and the contract of this case was terminated or terminated under Article 10(5) of the contract of this case, which provides that the contract of this case can be claimed upon the cancellation or termination of the contract of this case. Therefore, if the contract of this case was lawfully terminated by the contract of this case, the contract of this case, the contract of this case, the contractor, is obligated to pay the advance payment and return it. Thus, if the contract of this case was lawfully terminated by the contract of this case, the contract of this case, the contract of this case constitutes an insurance accident stipulated in the contract of this case. In addition, if it is evident that the contract of this case is not likely to complete the construction within the due to the contractor's responsible cause, the contract of this case may be terminated or terminated in whole or in part. In this case, the contract of this case is terminated or terminated after the deadline for payment was set and notified in writing, and it becomes effective upon notification

b) the Commission;

arrow