A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person subject to call as social work personnel.

A person who has received a call-up notice to social work personnel shall comply with the call-up within three days from the date of call.

Nevertheless, around 10:00 on September 24, 2015, the Defendant ought to convene a meeting to the 32 group of the Daejeon District Military Manpower Office, the 5 (Cultural Dong), the 16-ro, Daejeon District Military Manpower Office, the 5 (Cultural Dong), the 14:00 on October 12, 2015, and the 32 group of the Sejong District Military Manpower Office, the 14:0 on July 14, 201

'A' fails to respond to the call within three days from the date of the above call-up, without justifiable grounds, even though he/she directly received the notice of call-up to social work personnel under the name of the director of the Daejeon

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing receipt of a written notice of call-up to social work personnel, such as investigation report (person in charge of accusation in the Daejeon Conscription Military Affairs Administration B telephone conversations), investigation status (to listen to telephone statements and attach relevant Enforcement Decree), accusation report, accusation statement, written statement, coloring investigation into military service offenders, and receipt of

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 88(1)2 of the pertinent Article of the Military Service Act as to criminal facts is to recognize the defendant's mistake. However, the defendant was missing from July 30, 2006 to September 23, 2015 and was assigned a new call upon receiving the notice of convening the call of this case. The defendant has the record of being punished twice as a violation of the Military Service Act, and there are no other circumstances that can be considered as the reason why the defendant did not respond to the call, and all the circumstances shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the same as the order.