beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. The court's explanation is as follows: (a) adding "Nos. 2 and 5" to the ground of recognition of No. 4 of the first instance court's decision and adding "No. 4 of the second instance court's decision" to the ground of recognition of No. 13 of the fourth instance court's decision; and (b) it is like the statement of the
[h] Of the judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court stated that “The defendant worked in the elbs of the farming association division “from August 2010 to June 2012, the defendant reported that he had earned earned income of KRW 3.9 million per annum in 2011, and KRW 6.5 million per annum in 2012. There was no record of reporting earned income in 2010 to 2010 and 2013, and there was no record of imposing property tax from 2008 to 2014 [However, according to the head of passbook transaction under the name of the defendant (Article 4 and 5 evidence No. 4 and 5), according to the head of passbook transaction under the name of the defendant, the defendant made the above elbs of the farming division “from August 201 to December 1, 201, the defendant has earned income equivalent to the average of KRW 1.7 million per month, unlike the reported earned income];”
Of the judgment of the first instance court, Part 5 Section 19 Section 2 of the judgment, “The Defendant did not properly notify the Plaintiff of the conclusion of another insurance contract similar to that of the Plaintiff at the time of entering into the instant insurance contract (However, it appears that the details of insurance purchased Samsung Bio-resources at the time of entering into the insurance contract listed in attached Table 2 of the attached Table), which appears to have been the same at the time of entering into another insurance contract.”
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.