beta
Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by theO indicated as the representative of the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is an unincorporated association similar to the clan in Gwangju-gu P, and each land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each land of this case”) was registered in title to the net Q. The Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on October 16, 1965 due to the deceased Q’s inheritance on July 10, 1950, and the land listed in the separate sheet No. 2(2) was divided into the land listed in paragraph (1) of April 17, 1989, and the land listed in paragraph (4) was divided into the land listed in paragraph (3) of June 8, 1989.
On August 11, 1981, according to the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate, the land in Schedule 2, paragraphs 5 to 8 was not registered and managed by the deceased on May 10, 2006.
Defendant B’s wife, Defendant I, C, F, G, H, and J have been donated 1/21 of the shares of each land of this case from Defendant B to the deceased R and completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 28, 2009. Defendant D, E, and E, as the children of the deceased R, increase the shares of each of the above land from the deceased S with the children of the deceased S, and are currently the shareholders of the above real estate. Defendant L, M, as the children of the deceased R’s children, Defendant L and M are the shareholders of each of the above real estate, and Defendant L is the children of the deceased R, the mother, the mother, and the shares of each of the above real estate in each of the lands of this case, the shares in the attached Table 2(3), (4), and the attached Table 2(5) through (8).
Defendant K is a right holder of the shares of each land set forth in attached Tables 1 and 2, U(1) and Defendant L (2). Defendant NN association (hereinafter “Defendant NN association”) is a person holding a right to collateral security and superficies on each land set forth in attached Tables 3 and 4. Defendant C was set up a right to collateral security on each land set forth in attached Tables 2, 3 and 4. Defendant C was set up a right to collateral security on each land set forth in attached Tables 2, 2, 3 and 4
However, the plaintiff serves a duplicate of complaint.