1. The part concerning Plaintiff A in the judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim for addition in the trial room, is as follows.

In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s appointment cannot be deemed to have been promoted as a matter of course even if the Plaintiff A worked until the retirement age, and Article 17 of Chapter III of the Remuneration Regulations of the Busan Facilities Corporation provides that a period of one year shall be required to raise the salary grade between the employees, and that it shall not be increased when the employee reaches the highest salary grade of the relevant class, and that according to the “the salary grade by class according to the calculation of allowances” in the attached Table 13 of the above Remuneration Regulations, the highest salary grade of class 8 is 12 salary class. In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s appointment is determined to have increased the salary class by 1 to 8th class 6 of January 1, 2004 for each year after promotion and promotion at class 6 of January 1, 2004 in the absence of the instant accident. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is with merit within the scope of the above recognition.

(C) The details of Plaintiff A’s benefits are as follows.

* Basic grade: Taking into account the promotion and raise in salary as seen earlier, the entry in the basic column of the Schedule for Calculation of Actual Income in Annex A.

(Fend allowances of the end of the month specified in attached Table 3 of the Remuneration Regulations of the Busan Facility Corporation * The end allowances of the month specified in the column of the actual income calculation sheet in attached Form 1.

(Article 20 of the Remuneration Regulations of the Busan Facility Corporation) * Filial leave expenses: The same shall apply to the statement in the column of the actual income calculation sheet in attached Form 1.

(Annex 1) Welfare Regulations for the Busan Facility Corporation 1) * Long-term continuous service allowances: as specified in the column for the long-term continuous service allowances of the daily income calculation sheet in attached Form 1.

(Attachment 7) (3) The Rules of Employment of Busan Facility Corporation, which was a Plaintiff A, stipulates the retirement age of 60 years. Thus, the maximum working age is up to July 14, 2042, when the Plaintiff was 60 years of age.

(4) The Plaintiff A’s pro rata disability and labor ability loss rate is a serious vegetable plant with which treatment is completed, which constitutes two brain diversity damage (IV)-B-4 according to the Mabrid List, and the degree of loss of labor ability is 100%.

(5) Cost of living after the termination of the life period: income calculated by 1/3 (calculated as 66.67%) of income (calculated as 6.67% of the loss rate of labor ability): income in attached Form 369,793,077.