logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.08.16 2017고단1858
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On July 3, 2017, the Defendant was rejected on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to the “E beauty room” operated by the victim C in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si on July 12:00, 2017, putting alcohol in his/her hand and changed the head color of the victim, but he/she was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was rejected on the ground that he/she was under the influence of alcohol.

Along with the majority of 15 minutes, the cosmetic service of the victim was interfered with the victim's beauty room in a way that enables the victim to take a hings and take a hings, which means that hings the hings are 15 minutes.

2) On July 3, 2017, at around 14:00, the Defendant continued to interfere with the cosmetic operation of the victim’s beauty room over about 10 minutes by drinking the said “E beauty room” in a breathrostous manner, which led the victim to a large amount of voice, and breathing the disturbance.

B. On July 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the “H” restaurant operated by the victim F of the victim F in Ansan-si, Sinsan-si on July 14, 2017; (b) called “H” restaurant in which the victim F was under influence of alcohol; and (c) sound the customers and employees in the place “Y kb p p p p p p p k p p k p k k k,” and then h h h h k

It shall be free from love, if any.

“We, this year, h, h, h of this weather year, h of this h, z., z., make customers with high-quality meals available, and interfered with the operation of the restaurant by the victim over about 30 minutes, such as smoking tobacco in the business place without permission, notwithstanding the employee’s restraint.

2. On July 3, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was dissatisfied with the arrest of flagrant offenders under suspicion of interference with the duties, such as Paragraph (1) above at the Ansan-gu Police Station-type and the Criminal 2 Team office in Ansan-gu, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si; and (b) was arrested as flagrant offenders.

one time, whether the powers are not coming from the people;

내가 뭘 그리 잘...

arrow