Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the chairperson of the "Act on the Emergency Countermeasures of the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Cooperatives of the D Urban Renewal Promotion Zone", and the victim E (the age of 54) is the general director of the "Act on the Improvement of Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project of the D Urban Renewal Promotion Zone" (hereinafter referred to as

At around 09:20 on June 11, 2012, the defendant found in the office of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dental Maintenance Project Association on the qualifications of the president of the association, and there is a dispute with the victim about the qualifications of the president.

Si expenses have become Si expenses.

For the foregoing reasons, when the Defendant was frightened to the victim who was frighten, and was frighten one time in drinking, the Defendant inflicted an injury upon the victim in need of two weeks of crypary treatment, such as cryp and frighted base, and fright base, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The portion not guilty of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the chairperson of the Committee for Countermeasures against the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Organization of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) was in charge of a disturbance; (b) around June 16:57, 2012; (c) around June 7, 2012; (d) around June 21:54, 2012; (d) around June 8, 2012; and (e) around 12:42, June 8, 2012; and (e) around 10:07, June 9, 2012, the Defendant sent five times in total, “E, who is an executive officer of the Development of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Establishment of the Systems, committed occupational breach of trust in connection with the act of violating the payment of TV viewing services.”

As a result, the Defendant distributed information that damages the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out the fact on the text message of a mobile phone with a total of 368 mobile phone including the victim and its members.

2. Article 70(1) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.