logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.01.29 2015고단1049
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a B rocketing car.

On May 28, 2015, the Defendant proceeded along the two-lanes (excluding the left-hand turn- or right-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on) near the Gunsan-si Port on the 10:00 Gyeongsan-si Port on May 28, 2015, using one-lanes from the shooting distance of the next hospital to the remote distance of the main station.

At the time, there was a duty of care to properly operate and safely drive the steering system and the steering system by properly examining the right and the right of the person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle in the vicinity of the intersection where the traffic of the motor vehicle is high.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and instead neglected to do so, caused the victim C (hereinafter referred to as 40 years old) waiting in the front of the signal at the front room, which was driven by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as the "victim C") who was under the influence of the signal at the front of the Defendant vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury to the victim C due to the foregoing occupational negligence by causing about 2 weeks of injury to the fluoral base, etc., which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment to the victim E (11) who was on board the above fluoral vehicle, and suffered from the injury to the fluoral base, etc. requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim F (14 years of age), the injury to the fluoral base, etc. requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment, and the injury to the fluoral base, which requires approximately 1,250,148 of the repair cost of the above fluoral vehicle owned by the victim C at the same time.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated B rocketing car without purchasing mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and on-site photographs;

1. Mandatory insurance (A);

1.Each.

arrow