1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

가. 원고의 이 사건 등록상표 (1) 출원일/ 등록결정일/ 등록일/ 등록번호 : 2007. 6. 4./ 2008. 6. 13./ 2008. 8. 4./ 상표등록 제755846호 (2) 표장 : (3) 지정상품 : 상품류 구분 제32류의 음료용 야채주스, 맥주제조용 홉엑기스, 감주(甘酒), 과실분말(음료용), 과실시럽(음료용), 과실액(果實液), 레모네이드, 레모네이드용 시럽, 밀감수, 발포성 음료용 분말, 발포성 음료용 정제, 비알콜성 과일넥타, 비알콜성 아페리티프(Aperitifs), 비알콜칵테일음료, 사과주스, 사이다,

셀처탄산수(Seltzer water), 소다수, 아몬드시럽, 아이소토닉음료, 오렌지주스, 유장(乳漿) 음료, 음료용 사르사파릴라(Sarsaparilla), 음료용 셔벗, 인삼분말(음료용), 인삼엑기스, 인삼주스, 진저에일(Ginger ale), 콜라시럽, 탄산수, 탄산수제조제, 파인애플주스, 포도액, 포도주스, 토마토주스, 광천수, 생수, 인공광천수, 맥주, 맥주용 맥아즙, 스타우트, 합성맥주, 흑맥주, 녹차 성분이 함유된 비알콜음료

B. (1) On February 26, 2014, the Defendant filed a request for a trial for invalidation of the registration of the instant registered trademark (2014Da500) with the Intellectual Property Tribunal against the Plaintiff, and with the purport that “The registered trademark of this case falls under Articles 6(1)1, 2, 3, 7, and 7(1)11 of the Trademark Act, and thus, its registration must be invalidated pursuant to Article 71(1)1 and 5 of the Trademark Act.”

(2) On November 23, 2015, the Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board held that “The registered trademark of this case constitutes a mark indicating the raw materials, etc. of goods” under Article 6(1)3 of the Trademark Act if it is used for goods using Jinsibe, after the registration of the trademark was made, and that the trademark contains a quality of “where it is used for goods using ginseng heat as their raw materials, it shall be deemed that the general consumers have included a Jinsi (GG) ingredient.”