The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The sentence of the lower court against the accused (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant, even though having escaped from a traffic accident, is not very good in terms of the nature of the crime; (b) the fact that there are several times of past traffic accidents or the records of punishment for driving under drinking, etc., which are unfavorable to the Defendant; (c) the Defendant recognized and reflects the Defendant’s criminal act; (d) the Defendant did not want the Defendant’s punishment; (c) the instant vehicle was covered by a comprehensive insurance contract; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is somewhat inappropriate, and thus, the Defendant and his defense counsel’s allegation of unfair sentencing is reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the following judgment is rendered again after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are as shown in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after the accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (average circumstances in favor of the grounds for reversal of this case);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;