1. At the request of an exchange change in the trial, the Defendant made against the Plaintiff on December 6, 2015.

Details of the disposition

From June 15, 2001, the Plaintiff is delinquent in national taxes equivalent to KRW 563,759,00 in total, including gift tax, capital gains tax, etc.

From November 17, 2001 to November 10, 2012, the Plaintiff left Korea several times with Russia, the United States, China, etc. as shown in the “Entry and Departure Records.”

According to the Commissioner of the National Tax Service’s request for prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff on the ground of national tax delinquency, the Defendant issued a disposition of prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff on December 7, 2012, and even thereafter, the period of prohibition of departure has been extended several times on June 8, 2015, and the period of prohibition of departure was extended from June 7, 2015 to December 6, 2015, and the disposition of extending the period of prohibition of departure again on December 6, 2015 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 13, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 10, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 10, the purport of the entire pleadings of this case is legitimate, and the plaintiff's assertion that the disposition of this case is legitimate, there is no possibility that the plaintiff's current property would escape abroad since there is no property owned at all. The plaintiff did not gain any substantial profit due to the donation, the plaintiff's business trip currently in progress is essential, and the plaintiff's family's tuition fees and U.S. stay expenses were provided through the economic support of F and branch, the plaintiff's family members' economic activities, and the current status of the plaintiff's family members are currently being employed in the

Attached to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as stated in the attached Form.

Facts of recognition

As F, the head of the Plaintiff, the head of the Plaintiff, who operated an individual business due to the trade name H, was unable to operate a proper business due to the elderly age, the Plaintiff operated H on behalf of F from November 30, 1993 until November 30, 1999, which was the cessation date.

The plaintiff is a financial institution and a financial institution around June 1996 and January 1, 1997.