Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 13,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From June 2010 to October 2011, the Defendant served as an insurance solicitor at an agency of Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd. in Daegu Jung-gu.

1. Fraud to victims E;

A. On July 29, 2011, the Defendant presented to the said victim one promissory note (F, payment place, us bank, issuer G) with a face value of KRW 30 million at the agency of the said Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd., the Defendant made false statements to the effect that “The part of the customers who agreed within the said contract did not pay insurance premiums, and the bill discounts the bill, and this bill was issued with the bill, which is the bill, which is the part of the customers who agreed within the said contract, and that “G is a large and strong company in the industry and is able to trust it with good faith.”

However, the above bill presented by the Defendant to the victim was not a bill of exchange for the payment of the construction price of G, but a bill of exchange requested discount from H who had worked as the former duties of G around July 28, 2011. The above bill of exchange was requested to the Defendant for discount because the financial condition of G at the time is not good.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 26.4 million from the victim under the pretext of the discount of bills.

B. On August 4, 2011, the Defendant presented to the Plaintiff one promissory note (I, payment bank at the place of payment, issuer company G) with the amount of KRW 40 million to the Plaintiff at the D Agency of the Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd., and concluded that “a bill is discounted because some of the customers who contracted within the country did not pay premiums, and this bill is a bill of exchange with G construction, and that this bill is a bill of exchange, and that G is a company with large and strong height in the industry, which can be trusted and reliable.”

However, the fact is that the above bill presented by the defendant to the victim is not a bill of exchange received as the construction cost, but a bill of exchange, around July 28, 201, by the defendant at the discount of 30 million won for the above H, as in the above paragraph (a), as in the above paragraph (a), one promissory note with 40 million won.