Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is an Ansan wholesaler, and Defendant B was the operator of “D” and was in the same business relationship.

On October 2010, the Defendants purchased securities, such as the “F” restaurant located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is anticipated to be forged or insolvent, at the intermittent value, and offered to use them as construction cost, etc. in the course of the Defendants’ club operations. Defendant B purchased five copies of a forged family check from a deceased deceased person in the middle of October 2010, and Defendant A purchased two copies of a forged family check from the deceased person.

After that, on October 2010, Defendant B issued three copies of the household check “H, I, J, and K” in “D” located in the building located in the building in the building in Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, which was operated by the Defendant, (each payment is made: the central branch of the National Bank of Korea, the par value: 00,000 won: L, the due date: January 15, 201) as follows: L, the due date; D’s household check “M, N,O” (each payment is made: the family check is a true and issued to Q as it is issued on October 15, 201) around October 201.

As a result, the defendants conspired with the above family check 7 is a forged family check and delivered it to Q who knew of the forgery to Q as if he was actually issued a forgery, and as a result, it was used as a repayment of construction price.

2. The Defendants and the defense counsel were under consideration of the settlement of the construction cost as a result of the test. However, the Defendants and the defense counsel paid the monthly interest on the phone call with the credit service provider that they became aware of through the sports newspaper advertisement, and the check price shall be paid at the end of December 2011, which determined that the Defendants shall pay the following interest to be paid at the end of December 201, in order to resolve the financial difficulties, and issued a provisional coefficient list under the pretext of the construction price after the Defendants acquired

, however, that;