logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.24 2015고단1668
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: A, an employee of the Defendant, operates B vehicle at the Seoul Office located at the Busan Office located at the Busan Office located at the Busan Office located at 406km on January 10, 2005, with a large weight of 11.25t on the Defendant’s work, and (2) around March 18, 2005, at the Seoul Office located at the Busan Office located at the Busan Office located at the Busan Office located at 406km located at the Busan Office located at the Busan Office located at the Busan Office located at 406km on March 18, 2005, in violation of the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority.

On the other hand, the prosecutor prosecuted the facts charged of this case by applying Articles 86, 83(1)2 and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), and the summary order of KRW 500,000 was notified and finalized in this court.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, Article 86 of the above Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," the part of the decision that "the fine under the corresponding Article shall be imposed on the corporation," which is in violation of the Constitution, shall be imposed on the Constitutional Court (see Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70, which is applicable mutatis mutandis to the above facts charged, has retroactively lost its effect.

Thus, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant is announced under Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow