logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.08.20 2014고단2301
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 2301"

1. On April 29, 2014, the Defendant called the Victim’s New Card Call Center, Inc., a victim-based company, to temporarily raise the limit of the card being used to purchase a vehicle. The Defendant stated that “The credit card price due to the purchase of a vehicle will be paid in lump sum in the following month.”

However, in fact, when the Defendant was liable for the debt equivalent to KRW 40 million at the time, and the overdue card price is equal to KRW 3 million, and there is no other property, the Defendant purchased a motor vehicle with an increased temporary limit on the above-mentioned card, and sold it, and intended to use it for personal purposes, and even if a motor vehicle was purchased by using the increased limit on the card approved by the victim company, there was no intention or ability to pay the card price in lump sum for the following month.

After obtaining approval for the increase in the limit of card from the victim company, the defendant acquired the same amount of property profit by purchasing one-way automobile with the above card of 18.5 million won on the same day and not paying the price.

2. On May 2, 2014, the Defendant called the Victim’s New Card Call Center, Inc., a victim-based company, to temporarily raise the limit of the card he/she uses to purchase a vehicle. The amount of the card due to the purchase of a vehicle is to be paid in lump sum in the following month.

However, in fact, the Defendant, at the time, was liable for a debt equivalent to KRW 40 million with the financial right, and the overdue card price is equal to KRW 3 million, and there is no other property, he purchased an automobile with an increased temporary limit and sold it, and intended to use it for personal purposes, and even if he purchased an automobile using a card approved for increase in the limit by the victim company, the card price for the following month shall be the credit card price.

arrow