logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.16 2015가단120830
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant C, together with Defendant B, KRW 1.6 million and Defendant B, KRW 83.9 million out of the total amount of KRW 33 million.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the managing body of A, a multi-family housing located in Daegu Suwon-gu G under the Housing Act (hereinafter “instant multi-family housing”); Defendant B was working as the managing body of the instant multi-family housing from August 6, 2008 to February 28, 2008; Defendant F was working as the head of the management office of the instant multi-family housing from January 1, 2006 to February 28, 2008; Defendant C from March 1, 2008 to August 31, 2009; Defendant D from September 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011; and Defendant E from January 1, 201 to December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2013.

B. Article 47(1) of the Management Rules of the instant multi-family housing (hereinafter “Management Rules”) Article 45-2(1) of the Housing Act on deposit for management expenses (deposit for management expenses) (1) The management entity may collect expenses incurred in the management, operation, etc. of common areas of the relevant multi-family housing (

Article 45 (1) of the Housing Act provides that management expenses necessary for the management of common areas of the apartment concerned shall be used for the management of common areas of the apartment concerned, Article 45 (3) of the Housing Act provides that user fees, etc. shall be paid to each management entity, and Article 45 (5) of the same Act provides that management expenses, user fees, etc., long-term repair appropriations, reserves and reserves thereof, warranty bonds, and all other revenues generated from the apartment management complex concerned shall be "management expenses, etc." and Article 57 (2) of the same management rules provides that other revenues than management expenses, such as the sale of recycled products, may be paid

C. The Plaintiff determined the method of management as an autonomous management pursuant to Articles 6(1) and 34(1) of the Management Rules, and organized an autonomous management body as a management body, supervised the autonomous management body pursuant to Article 34(2), and selected and appointed the chief of the Management Office pursuant to Article 34(4).

Article 36 of the Management Rules shall be deemed to be the Regulations.

arrow