[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.A.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those engaged in driving a rocketing car.

At around 02:45 on March 1, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, driven the said two-lane road from the entrance of the Mari-Eup, Pari-ri printing complex, leading the said vehicle to the direction of the luminous plane from the direction of cooking and Eup.

At this point, there was a center line of yellow solid lines, so in such a case, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to live well, observe the lanes, and safely drive the lanes to prevent traffic accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in the course of the business, and the part of the victim E (the age of 48) driving, which was proceeding in the opposite part of the Defendant, was taken as the front part of the left-hand part of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, while at the same time, destroyed the victim’s car to be repaired in an amount equivalent to KRW 15,051,410, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

B. On March 1, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) without obtaining a driver’s license. On March 1, 2015, around 02:45, the Defendant driven a rocketing car at a section of about 18 kilometers from the Do in the front of the Yongsan-gu G to the front of the H at the time of sowing.

C. On March 1, 2015, the Defendant who had attempted to commit an offense.

It is true that while driving a car like the same as the paragraph, the victim E-car suffered an injury to the victim, and at the same time the victim did not take necessary measures even after destroying the car.

The defendant.