Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 123,212,212 to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from June 19, 2017 to February 17, 2021 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) The defendant is a company that manufactures and sells automobile parts. The plaintiff is an employee who has worked for the defendant company from April 26, 2017 to March 15, 2019.
B) After being employed by the Defendant Company, the Plaintiff was placed in the press room. On June 19, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) changed the press room operation method from the method of using both hands; and (b) while operating the press room by using the presses, the Plaintiff suffered an injury on the top of the two sides of the 2 presses on the wind where the presses came into the left hand; (c) at the time of the instant accident, at the Defendant Company’s workplace, 7 presses on the two presses by dividing the two presses by both hands (hereinafter “the two presses”). However, at the time of the instant accident, 3 presses on the top of the two presses on the top of the 2 presses, and the two presses on the top of the 3 presses on the top of the 3 presses on the top of the 3 presses on the top of the machines (hereinafter “the two presses”).
The key to the machine can be sticked to the machine by sticking it, and in general, the machine is working by using the hand hand and manufacturing large products. In exceptional cases where it is necessary to catch the product by hand, it is required to change it to a hand-on method.
Each press machine is installed with automatic opher, so that automatic opher can automatically stop if the hand or other things are reduced during the operation of machinery, but the things to be worked by the opal method are in contact with the opher due to their size, so it shall turn off the license and work if it is changed by the opal method.
[Reasons for Recognition] A. 2] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence, witness C and D's testimony, pleading.