(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2014.10.29 2014가단200950

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2014.10.29 2014가단200950

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 30, 2011, the Defendant, as the father of C, filed a complaint against the Plaintiff, who is a member of D church, on the charge of injury, and the details thereof are as follows.

On March 28, 2011, as the father of the victim C, for the reason that the son, who is the church owner, is walking a cryp, set up on the front road of the church in front of the church, he is unable to hear the crypology accompanied by his head cryp and the sound to the right side after the accident that prices the head of the same head as the cryp with his head with the right floor by drinking his son.

Accordingly, I have filed a complaint with the father of the victim.

B. In the meantime, the Plaintiff was prosecuted for a serious injury after the police investigation and prosecutor's investigation, and was tried by this court as 201 Gohap79. On February 16, 2012, the Defendant was acquitted of the charge that "on March 28, 2011, the Defendant was convicted of the charge that "on the left hand floor of the victim, he saw the victim C with his desire on March 28, 201, he did not interfere with the victim's right head part of the victim's right head on one occasion and one time, with his left hand, by walking the victim's left part of the victim's right head on one occasion, and assaulting the victim's head on five to six occasions due to the left hand," and that "the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won on the right side part of the treatment days," and that "the Defendant was not guilty."

(hereinafter “instant criminal judgment”) C.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff and the Prosecutor appealed the instant criminal judgment as Seoul High Court (Chuncheon) No. 2012No38, but was sentenced to the said court’s judgment on July 11, 2012, and the Plaintiff filed a second appeal as Supreme Court Decision 2012Do9424 on November 29, 2012, but the instant criminal judgment became final and conclusive as it became final and conclusive.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 2, 3 (including virtual numbers), and oral arguments.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2020.12.23 2020가단211125

-서울북부지방법원 2020.04.23 2019가단109381

-창원지방법원 2020.05.08 2019고단3971

-춘천지방법원 속초지원 2014.02.19 2013고정245

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.01.28 2014고정601