The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (4 months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: although the part which the defendant denied at the court below's trial was found to have been erroneous until the part which the defendant denied at the court below's trial, it is deemed that the wife and her two daughters must be supported by the wife and her children, and living conditions are very difficult, there is no record of crime except punishment for a crime different from each crime of this case in 2002, but the victim D has a considerable amount of damage incurred due to each crime of this case. The victim D had 4 years and 10 months since the date of each crime of this case, 5 years and 11 months since the date of each crime of this case, 4 years and 10 months since the date of each crime of this case, 5 years and 1 months since the date of each crime of this case, it was impossible for the defendant to receive a letter from the victim due to an agreement with the victim, and other circumstances such as the motive and background leading up to each crime of this case, circumstances before and after each crime of this case, defendant's age, character and occupation, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

(However, among the judgment below, it is clear that the "fact that the company was changed" in Part 3 No. 9 of the judgment of the court below is a mistake in the "fact that the company was told to the effect that the company was changed," and thus, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on