1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1.The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in each entry or image of Gap evidence 1 to 6, by integrating the whole purport of the pleadings:

With respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Defendant”).

나. 이 사건 사고의 발생 원고 차량의 운전자는 2014. 12. 18. 17:15경 부산 동래구 안락동 뜨란채아파트 앞 편도 4차로 도로(이하 이 사건 도로라고 한다)의 1차로를 따라 원고 차량을 운전하여 해운대 방면에서 안락 교차로 방면으로 진행하다가 ㅓ자형 삼거리 교차로(이하 이 사건 교차로라고 한다)에 이르러 좌회전차로인 1차로에서 좌회전 신호를 받아 좌회전하던 중 좌회전과 직진차로인 2차로에서 좌회전 하던 피고 차량의 좌측 뒷좌석 문짝 뒷부분과 좌측 뒷휀다 부분을 원고 차량의 우측 앞범퍼와 우측 앞휀다 부분으로 충격하였다

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident". On the other hand, the roads in the direction that the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant vehicle want to turn to the left are three-lane roads, and it was possible to proceed only one-lane due to the construction work at the time of the accident.

C. On January 23, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 405,000 in total with the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident to the repair company, etc.

2. Assertion and determination

A. The plaintiff 1's assertion of the parties reached the left turn on one lane, and the defendant 1's vehicle has to turn to the left in accordance with the two-lane, so the accident of this case occurred by changing the lane in the intersection, despite the fact that the defendant 1 should turn to the left, and the driver of the defendant 1 who violated the duty not to change the lane in the intersection.