The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around 13:00 on January 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sustained an injury in the case where the Defendant had been on the part of the victim E (the South and 54 years old) in the Dogs or sloping room located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, as a result of the injury that had been on the part of the victim E (the age of 54), and caused an injury to the victim, such as light salt dynas, etc., requiring treatment for about 14 days,

2. The judgment E, upon the Defendant’s report, testified that the police officer F and G arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of assault against the Defendant, and that the Defendant was not subject to the Defendant’s assault and investigation.

As a result, F and G police officers who were called up at the time were examined in the field of the person concerned in this court, this case stated that E was investigated as one of the assault cases against the accused.

After that, E made a statement that he was injured by the Defendant, along with the medical certificate, and that he was injured by the Defendant until this Court had taken place.

In light of the fact that E does not have any explanation to the reasons for reversal of the statement, the content of the diagnosis document is written that the external upper part of the body is not found, and that the content of the statement does not fit the situation, such as the defendant's statement that E and H were satisfing, even though the defendant did not put in the shoulder, E and H are more reliable in the initial police statement of E, and the police statements, statements in this court, and H's statements after E are difficult to believe.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the