The part of the judgment of the first instance against Defendant K, M, N,O, P, Q, R, U, K, AK, AL, AM, andN shall be revoked.

The plaintiffs' defendant.

1. At the time of the death of January 10, 1997, AOO of the basic fact-finding network was the deceased's children, and the deceased, D, E, F, G, H, I, I, and their wife were deceased on December 27, 2008. The deceased's heir of the network AP was deceased on December 27, 2008, and other brothers and sisters except the defendant J were deceased at the time of the deceased's death, or were deceased after the death, and eventually, the deceased's property heir of the deceased AP did not have the same ownership as that of the deceased's inheritance, or the deceased's heir of the deceased's heir of the deceased's property of the deceased's heir of the deceased's heir of the deceased's heir of the deceased's heir of the deceased's heir of the deceased's heir of the deceased's heir of the deceased's property of the deceased's heir of each of the real property of the deceased's No. 1, 2018.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment

A. On September 27, 1996, before the deceased AO died, the summary of the claim for ownership transfer registration based on gift 1) argues that the Defendants are obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on gift to the Plaintiffs as to the shares of each of the instant real estate. 2) The testimony of the first instance court witness I, which corresponds to the fact of the deceased AO donation as claimed by the Plaintiffs, is not easy to understand that the deceased AO was a public official or a public official's spouse's spouse's property, and that the plaintiffs expressed their intent to donate only to the plaintiffs. 20 years have passed since the deceased AO donation.