The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles did not have any intention to impair the honor of the victim at the time of sending each guide of this case. The defendant's sending of each guide of this case to the defendant is deemed inappropriate for the victim whose property was seized to collect and manage management expenses due to delinquency in tax, and it is intended to inform the owners and occupants of this fact, and thus, it is for the public interest. Therefore, the illegality is not dismissed.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles are: (a) the Defendant continued to have a dispute over the managing body of the C building building at the time of sending each of the instant guide; (b) the Defendant and the victim were in conflict with each other; (c) the victim was unable to readily conclude that it is not possible for the victim to collect and manage management fees solely because of such circumstance; (d) the victim, etc. constituted a separate meeting of shop occupants to the above commercial building; and (e) the Defendant appears to have collected management fees with the consent of some owners and shop occupants; (e) the Defendant sent each of the instant guide to the above whole commercial tenant four times in a short term; and (e) the content of each of the instant guide, as stated in the facts charged in the lower judgment, cannot be deemed as for the public interest; and (e) the Defendant’s intent to impair the reputation of the victim was attempted at the time of sending the guide.

B. The content and frequency of dispatch of each guide and guide sent by the defendant on the assertion of unfair sentencing, and the scope of the other party.