logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.25 2016고단4379
일반교통방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 08:10 on September 2, 2016, the Defendant was driving a F-authorized SM5 car in the way of one lane between the two lanes in the way in Seoul direction-gu Hopdong, Hoyang-dong, Hoyang-dong, Seoul. On September 2, 2016, the Defendant discovered the H SP car driven by the victim G (n.e., age 39) while driving a F-authorized SM5 car in a two-lane in the tunnel direction-gu, Seoul. On the immediately preceding day, the Defendant sawd the victim's vehicle in a first line in front of the Defendant's vehicle, leaving the victim temporarily stopped and temporarily stopped the Defendant. The Defendant saw the victim's vehicle in front of the victim's vehicle in a manner of resistanceing to the victim.

The Defendant, while driving the said SM5 vehicle with the two-lanes, was driving along the two-lanes, changed the direction, etc. to one lane on the front of the victim's vehicle driven along the one-lane, and left the victim's vehicle in the front of the other victim's vehicle driven along the one-lanes without any circumstances to stop immediately, and immediately stop the victim's vehicle in a manner to reduce the speed by suddenly operating the vehicle despite the absence of any circumstances to stop, and walk the victim's vehicle toward the vehicle from the vehicle to the vehicle of the victim. The Defendant threatened the victim with the victim's face, " how the vehicle is dangerous, and it has been driven before the other," and accordingly, the Defendant stopped the 20 vehicle in the front side of the victim's vehicle, and made a partial conflict.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with the above SM5 car, which is a dangerous object, and stopped the above SM5 car on the motorway and obstructed the traffic of motorway.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing a tunnelctv video;

1. Relevant Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts, Article 185 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with general traffic), Article 156 subparag. 3 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow