Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant's imprisonment (one year and six months of imprisonment) declared by the court below against the defendant is too uneased, and the prosecutor is too uneased and unfair.

2. The judgment below's sentence against the defendant is reasonable in light of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including: (a) there is no special change of circumstances that the court determines the punishment differently from the judgment below; (b) there is no reason to determine the sentencing guidelines of this court for the fraud of the borrowed money; and (c) in light of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, such as the sentencing guidelines of this court for the fraud of the borrowed money, the defendant's age, method of the crime, and the result, etc., when considering the following: (a) there is no agreement with the majority victim; (b) the damage was not recovered due to the failure to agree with the majority victim; (c) the defendant has the means of receiving the borrowed money loan by forging the borrowed money loan; (d) the defendant has already been sentenced three times of punishment due to fraud, which is a like crime, and (e) there is no other favorable reason

3. If so, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.