A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant left to the victim C at a place where he was in fire, “I left his her son’s tablet to the pawned Hall, and his son immediately left Japan.

The repayment of money shall be carried out by the owner of the pawned Art. (1) after searching for the plaqueed Art. (2) in the pawned Art. (3) of the Seoul Metropolitan Art. (2) of the Republic of Korea.

“...”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to return money to the injured party immediately after returning the lost money to the pawne and return the money to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as mentioned above, was issued 6 million won as the borrowed money from the injured party on the same place.

B. On December 6, 2010, the Defendant borrowed the above victim’s second floor of E branch office located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E branch office located in Dobong-gu, Seoul, with the need of KRW 10 million to create the family register in Japan.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, it was thought that it was used in another place.

Nevertheless, the Defendant paid KRW 10 million in the name of the national bank account (G) in the name of F, a parent of the same day, from the victim’s false statement as above.

(c)

On July 29, 2014, the Defendant called “Around July 29, 2014,” and called “Around July 2014, the Defendant lent KRW 10 million as the officetel deposit owned by son F in the ceiling is urgently required.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, it was thought that it was used in another place.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was paid KRW 10 million in the name of the national bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant’s father, a husband of the victim on the same day by making use of the account in the name of H, which is the husband of the victim.

2. On September 28, 2009, the Defendant, at around September 28, 2009, engaged in the preparation of a private document for qualification solicitation and holding a private document for qualification solicitation, shall be in black fences without authority for the purpose of uttering.