The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each of the punishments (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) declared by the lower court to the Defendants is too unfford.

2. In light of the legislative intent of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. to eradicate the act of arranging sexual traffic, the Defendants’ liability for the crime of this case is not weak, and the Defendants committed the crime of this case again despite the previous criminal convictions, etc. However, considering the overall circumstances that include the Defendants’ mistake, and the period, frequency, size, etc. of each crime, and the Defendants’ age-oriented environment, etc., the Prosecutor’s assertion cannot be accepted.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.