Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 4040"

1. The Defendants’ co-principals (Fraud and attempted fraud) (Fraud and attempted fraud) knew that the Defendant A could easily impose money on the Defendant B through the Internet game with the knowledge that the Defendants could have easily punished the money. The Defendant B proposed to commit a crime by speech, and the Defendant B accepted it.

Defendant

A entered the “one million won per day” into the Internet C Search Book, searched a part-time fee, which seems to be a sign-time fee book, and contacted the name poor party who posted the job offer advertisement with the method of committing the crime, and received the order to purchase the Nowon-gu bank and name cards necessary for committing the crime, and then, the documents and the “Financial Services Commission” stated as the “Financial Services Commission” and the “Personnel Card” issued by the Financial Supervisory Service to inform the Defendant B of the fact that he was the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.

Since then, Defendant B conspired to play a role, such as collecting money from victims or remitting money to the account directed by the winners of the name, and Defendant B’s attempt to take the Defendant B into the place of receiving money. A.

On November 14, 2018, the name omitted person who was the cause of the organization that committed the fraud of the victim D was called as the victim D, “The new name passbook was illegally opened in the case of the victim’s identity theft, and the one who made a report was 12 cases or more because the passbook was fraudulently established in the case of the victim’s identity theft, and the one who made a report was made in the passbook. To prove that the party is the victim, the name omitted person who was the organization that was the victim of the fraud will be able to safely leave the cash to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.”

However, the nameless person was not a prosecutor or prosecutory investigator, and there was no fact that the account in the name of the victim was used for another person's criminal act.

As above, a person who is not aware of his name shall deception the victim and shall cause the victim to do so in cash.