beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
Of the facts charged in the case No. 2017 order 1253, C is relevant.
Reasons
Criminal facts
2017 Highest 371
1. On January 11, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at a coffee shop stating that “When a party cancels provisional attachment, the Defendant would repay KRW 20 million to the victim KRW 1.5 million on January 27, 2012, the Defendant would repay to the victim KRW 20 million on the 27th day of each month the provisional attachment.”
On March 7, 2012, the Defendant lost the opportunity for the Defendant to secure the claim through the above provisional seizure against the victim by being released from provisional seizure on March 7, 2012, and made E obtain economic benefits equivalent to the equivalent amount of the opportunity.
2. Fraud against victim F;
A. The Defendant is a space between the victim’s wife-type G.
The Defendant introduced “H”, which was merely a mere construction work for ordinary G and the family members of the victim, as if the Defendant were the ownership of the Defendant, and led the Defendant to believe that the Defendant was the re-existence of the victim.
In addition, the Defendant heard from the victim that he want to send his child to the Ischool located in Jeju-do, and made the victim believe that he could exercise influence over the victim's father to enter the I school by expanding the beer in Jeju-do.
On May 26, 2014, the Defendant sent a telephone to the victim at a place where it is impossible to know that it is located in the Gangseo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City on May 26, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “in Jeju-do, he is currently in Jeju-do, and because he knows about a large amount of connection in Jeju-do, he would have his children enter the I school. On the other hand, the Defendant will use three million won as the expenses for the entrance examination and make a repayment to him within several days.”
However, in fact, the defendant's wife is fixed to I School.