logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.09.21 2016나1874
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the fact that "each entry in the evidence Nos. 5 and 10" is changed into "each entry or video of the evidence Nos. 5, 10, 13, 14, and 16" among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the entry in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit is accepted within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining principal claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow