Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for seven months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants received proposals from F, G, etc. to the effect that the examination of employee loan loans and the collection of loans are divided by taking advantage of the fact that the procedures for the examination of employee loan loans and the collection of loans are not strict compared to other loans, and agreed to do so, Defendant B conspired in order with F, G, public intermediary H, etc. to acquire loans by deceiving financial institutions by taking charge of false tenant roles.

Defendant

B, around March 22, 2014, at the “J-authorized Brokerage Office” office for H’s operation located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong (hereinafter “A-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

At that time, Defendant A received false certificates of employment and related documents of L Company, which did not have actually worked from F, and received the above false lease contract, and on April 18, 2014, Defendant A submitted false documents such as the above lease contract and employment certificate to the employees in charge of L Company A and applied for the loan of full-time funds for the loan of workers at the branch office of Han-dong, Sung-dong, U.S. on April 18, 2014.

Therefore, on April 18, 2014, the Defendants were paid KRW 62 million to the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendants were provided 62 million won in collusion with F, G, H in sequence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A real estate lease agreement;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on the loan application for one bank;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Defendant A with the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B): The fact that the nature of the crime is inferior in light of the applicable law of the instant crime, and that the amount of the fraud is not entered.