Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the business owner who actually operated “C”, which is a sexual traffic business establishment in Seongbuk-gu B and 2, Sungnam-gu, and D is a person who has been aware of since 2005 with the Defendant.

On April 11, 2013, the Defendant, at around 19:00, controlled the said “C sexual traffic business” and was known to the general public.

D was the president of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the shop.

On April 11, 2013, the Defendant issued a fine to D in writing, appointed a defense counsel at the time of trial, and ordered 10 million won as compensation.

The phrase “D had D had D feel mind to allow the escape of the Defendant, who is an unemployed owner, and had D make a statement as if D was an unemployed owner of the instant sexual traffic business establishment at the investigation of the Sungnam Police Station and the economic 2 team office at the time of the above day, and abetted D to avoid committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect by the prosecution against the accused, D, E, F, and G;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (for the J actual operator), investigation reports (Attachment to the K Building Lease Agreement), investigation reports (for January 6, 201 and by January 6, 2012, appending the K Building Lease Agreement).

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 151(1) and 31(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts (excluding punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;