beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who works temporarily from “C” located in Kimhae-si B from October 2015 to March 2016 and has been engaged in the duties of selling the Internet.
1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) using a computer located in the foregoing “C” office for the purpose of uttering at the foregoing office; and (b) by using the computer located in the said office, the transferor D (C) assigned the following claims to the transferee A as of August 10, 2016; (c) thus, the Defendant notified the transferee A of the following claims.
(C) In accordance with the notice of assignment of the claim, the claim for all settlement payments, and the transferor D(C) arising after March 10, 2016, held by the transferor D(C) and D(C) shall, in relation to the above claim, undertake not to raise any objection to the payment of the settlement payment to the transferee A, in any further manner, in accordance with the notice of assignment of the claim.
On March 10, 2016, "D's representative D" was stated as "D's representative D, and D's Korean seal was affixed to the right and right of the name, thereby forging one copy of D's notice of transfer of claims in the name of private document related to rights and obligations.
2. The Defendant sent the notice of the transfer of forged claim to the person in charge of the name in the above-mentioned MUF, who is aware of the forgery at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, and exercised it by mail as the above-mentioned notice was duly concluded.
3. The Defendant, at the time, at the place, and at the time, at the time, at paragraph 1, and in fact, did not have received a claim for the settlement payment against the victim-affiliated Bank, as described in paragraph 2, by issuing the victim-based notice of the transfer of the forged claim to an employee in the name of the victim company and deceiving the victim as if he were transferred the claim from D, and then deceiving the victim company as if he were transferred the claim from D, which is KRW 10,57,47, March 15, 2016.