All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

In light of the circumstances stated in its holding, the lower court determined that the Plaintiff’s assertion seeking implementation of the title trust termination or ownership transfer registration procedure based on the declaration of intention of profit is groundless, on the ground that it is difficult to view that the purport of recognizing title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants as to the forest of this case and the decision in lieu of conciliation finalized between FJ and the Defendants is included in the purport of recognizing the formation of the title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the third party with respect to the forest of this case, and determined that the Plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed in accordance with the principle of

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on the interpretation of documents, contracts for a third party, and title trust, or by violating the duty of explanation.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.