beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, three years of imprisonment for Defendant B, eight months of imprisonment for Defendant C, and one year of imprisonment for Defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On July 6, 2011, after being sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, the above judgment was finalized on July 14, 201. On May 27, 2009, Defendant E was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on August 20, 2009 by the same court.
1. Defendant A, B, and C (hereinafter “2013 Highest 4179-4”), the said Defendants, at around 15:00 on November 19, 2009, received KRW 150,000,00 from Defendant C’s house of Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of acquiring Q main points located on the second floor P of this Seoul, at KRW 150,000,000, and paid KRW 200,000,000 from the victim’s office to the victim’s O without any premium for raising two school expenses in U.S. study, or for raising two school expenses from his father in the U.S., the said Q main points and the Gangwon-do class R forest located on the part of the said victim, and paid KRW 50,000,000 from the victim’s tin.
However, the facts are that Defendant C did not take over the above Q points, and the above Defendants did not have the authority to dispose of them.
As above, the above Defendants conspired to deception the above victim and acquired 20 million won by deception.
2. On September 14, 2006, Defendant A, B, and E (hereinafter referred to as “2013 Highest 4179-3”), the said Defendants, at the site of the construction of an officetel in Gwangju Mine-gu, issued the victim L with the right to dispose of 4 officetels bonds from the private stock company in lieu of the payment of the price for the instant officetel construction. As such, Defendant A, B, and E (hereinafter referred to as “2013 Highest 4,179-3”), saying, the said Defendants were paid KRW 170 million from the said victim for the purchase of officetels.
However, the above Defendants did not have any intention or ability to dispose of the above Defendants as they did not have the right to dispose of officetels from T Co., Ltd.
As above, the above Defendants conspired to deception the above victim and acquired 170 million won by deception.
3. Defendant A and B (hereinafter referred to as “2013 Highest 4179-2”) the said Defendants are Gangnam-gu Seoul on January 22, 2011.