(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.06.04 2019가합37229

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.06.04 2019가합37229

소유권이전등기절차이행청구 등

Text

1. The Defendants, among the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 2-A through (c) of the same list, shall be against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 3, 2018, the deceased F, the spouse of Defendant C and Defendant C, entered into the instant sales contract and the payment of down payment and intermediate payment, is the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table of Real Estate (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) The sales contract to sell the purchase price of KRW 890,000,000 to Plaintiff A and G (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

(2) The sales contract of this case provides that KRW 90,00,000 in the intermediate payment of KRW 300,000 in the intermediate payment of KRW 300,000 in the intermediate payment of KRW 300,000 in the intermediate payment of KRW 500,000 until September 20, 2018 shall be paid until October 31, 2018, and the down payment and intermediate payment of KRW 500,00 in the intermediate payment of KRW 300,00 in the intermediate payment of KRW 30,00 in the intermediate payment of KRW 30

The Plaintiffs paid KRW 390,000,000 in total to the accounts agreed upon pursuant to the instant sales contract.

B. The agreement 1) The deceased on December 4, 2018, in lieu of the payment of the remainder due to the receipt of the lease deposit. The deceased F died on December 4, 2018, and there was Defendant C, Defendant D, and E, the spouse of the deceased F. The Defendants agreed to fully cooperate in the settlement of the remainder and the transfer registration under the instant sales contract, but the Defendants did not comply with the reasons that I received the purchase price for one’s own inheritance from the instant apartment. (2) The Plaintiffs and the Defendants were to substitute the payment of the remainder as the lease deposit received by the Defendant for the lease deposit, and the obligation to return the said lease deposit was agreed to succeed by the Plaintiffs.

On April 9, 2019, Defendant C entered the network F already died as a joint name, and set the lease deposit amount as KRW 500,000,000,000, and leased the instant real estate to J, and received KRW 500,000,000 from the lease deposit.

3. Since then, the plaintiffs did not register the transfer of ownership of the apartment of this case. 10 million won from the defendant side.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.12 2018가합512568 (1)

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.19 2018가합512568

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.02 2016가단5305542

-서울북부지방법원 2020.07.16 2018가단125478

-수원지방법원평택지원 2019.02.14 2018가단54437