beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.12.07 2016고정1024
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the employer from September 2, 2013 to November 3, 2014.
The retirement allowance of B was not paid 2,294,222 won.
2. Determination
A. The case shall not be prosecuted against the will expressed by the victim.
(Article 44 (proviso) of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act)
After the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention not to be punished against the defendant.
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;