A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury in the Jeonju District Court’s branch branch on March 11, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jeonju prison on March 11, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

On October 27, 2011, around 19:30 on October 27, 201, the Defendant was serving as a guest in the Dourel in Go Chang-gun, Go Chang-gun, North Korea.

The Defendant kept up laundry machine in the process of having the laundry machine operated in order to laundry his laundry of work in a washing room located in the above laundry floor.

The victim E (the age of 79) who is an employee of the laundher, was divided into laundher on behalf of the defendant in order to help the defendant, but the laundher did not act properly.

Accordingly, the Defendant stated to the victim that “I am see to know about the subject,” “I am see to do so.”

The defendant committed a defect in the victim's behavior, such as disregarding the victim's horse and continuously laundrying the laundry machine.

The defendant, by hand, has tightly damaged the victim's shoulder on a single-time basis, turned the victim over the floor.

The Defendant sustained 3 to 4 times from the face and head of the victim who continued to go beyond her face, and sustained about 4 weeks of the victim’s face face by drinking her four times, and sustained the victim’s injury, i.e., “I.D. Mad-gun and HI. Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Requesting cooperation in investigation affairs (issuance of a medical certificate for injury);

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, investigation reports (recognating repeated offenses and attaching judgment) and statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act, among repeated offenders, seems to be not good to the nature of the crime of this case and not to have considerable degree of damage, the defendant has been punished several times due to the same crime, and the defendant again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime.