The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment of 1 year and 6 months sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, his age, his parent's divorce, and his parent's divorce.

Considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s assertion, the circumstance of the Defendant’s assertion, and the fact that the Defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (b) the instant crime committed by intrusion on the room or office occupied by another person at night; (c) theft of property by taking advantage of stolen cell phones and identification cards; and (d) defrauding property gains on the Internet site using the stolen cellular phone and identification cards; (c) the crime of this crime is not good; (d) the Defendant was punished for a suspended sentence of two years on May 10, 2012; (e) the Defendant was punished for a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of occupational embezzlement and escape from military service; (e) there was no endeavor by the Defendant to recover damage; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is reasonable and unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.