logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.12.16 2020고단3299
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 600,000 won.

However, the above imprisonment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 10, 2020, the Defendant reported 112 on the street in front of Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, at around 23:05 on August 10, 202, that “I fright to fright to fright and fright to fright to fright.” On the ground that the Defendant was notified by the police officer belonging to the D Zone D District District of the Gyeongnam-gu Police Station of the Gannam-gu Police Station of the penalty as to the illegal dumping of the Defendant’s fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright,”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning civil petition handling affairs.

2. On September 7, 2020, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from around 01:40 on the same day to around 02:07 on the same day, at the D District District of the G G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the middle of the G in the G in the middle of the Dong-gu Police Station, for the reason that the Defendant experienced inconvenience due to the malfunction of an automatic cash withdrawal machine in the vicinity, the Defendant was able to set up several corresponding tables within the said district, and “I am going off for two hours in the cash payment machine, so I am off for two hours, so I am.” Even if the Defendant was requested from the G in the past H, etc., even if having continued to go home from the police station, the Defendant continued to put the wall in the way of smoking. I am for approximately 27 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to a very rough speech and behavior in a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on CDs 1, a written statement, a written statement, a written circumstantial statement, and criminal video CDs

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of obstruction of official duties at the government office) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of penalty;

arrow