1.(a)

The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, as well as KRW 28,727,420, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively.

1. The facts following the premise of the determination are acknowledged as either the dispute or the purport of the entire pleadings, in addition to each macro- documentary evidence.

F, G, and Plaintiff A were those who were enrolled in the second year of “H middle school” as of April 2013.

Plaintiff

B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A (A 8), Defendant D is the F, and Defendant E are the copies of G.

Plaintiff

A was a student from the second year prior to the middle school year, “I Q 70 to 73 level”) who was a student of “a letter that was fluent in the initial development due to assistance and early development compared to the past (I Q 70 to 73 level).

[A] The F, F, and G put the Plaintiff with such harassment as described in attached Forms 1 and 2.

(B) During the Promotion Act, G refers to “G” and “F” respectively, and the remainder remaining after subtracting the following parts / [5] - In the instant case, the Plaintiffs did not separately assert the part concerning “paragraph (b)(C) of the attached Table 1 list,” and the remaining part of “(b) and (b)” were asserted that F and G jointly committed such act, but there is no evidence to prove that G participated in or jointly committed such act. This part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is not acceptable. G was continuously subject to juvenile protective disposition (including the entrustment of care and custody order, 40 hours) by the Busan Family Court on July 4, 2014, 201 [2] the Plaintiffs were subject to juvenile protective disposition from the juvenile reformatory on the ground that they were unable to receive counseling and protective disposition from the juvenile reformatory on the ground that they had been subject to counseling and protective disposition from the juvenile reformatory on the ground that they were jointly committed by F and G. G’s act. G’s bullying, and that they were committed such act.