1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

I. Under the premise, the victim J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter only referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.”) was established in 1978 and is a company that manufactures probs and small diskettess (a device that temporarily connects semiconductors produced to PCB for inspection) that are not the chief prosecutor of semiconductors, and the semiconductors are installed. The parts of semiconductors are small diskettess, and the parts that electrically connect semiconductors and PCBs in small diskettes are probs.

Defendant

A As a researcher of the victim company from the point of December 7, 1998, from July 31, 2008 to engage in the business of developing the electrical characteristics of the product with the position of the president of the research institute from July 31, 2008, and retired on June 30, 2010. Defendant K retired from the business of developing the production technology of the victim company from around April 1996, and retired from the position of being commissioned with the treatment of directors on September 17, 201, and Defendant B is a person in charge of the business of developing the production technology from around September 1999.

At the time of 198, the victim company introduced the production method using the "AT" rather than the existing method of assembling 71 employees and 7.8 billion won in sales, but not the existing method of assembling the fine probs with human losses, and subsequently, the poor rate was lowered by shortening the payment period and listed on the KOSDAQ in 2013, and the sales amount was 80.6 billion won in 2013.

Defendant

A retired with the data such as the drawings of the victim company, and then, A had been engaged in business as the U.S. agency of the victim company for a long time, and had been employed in L which is planned to produce the same product as the victim company after the termination of the contract.

However, Defendant A, who was engaged exclusively in the business of developing electrical characteristics, was difficult to have a mixed production system, which led the development of manufacturing processes using the product design and the “AT” in the victim company, has been employed L.