Defendant

A Child Care Center shall be dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the child care center of Defendant A, a person in charge of managing the child care workers, takes priority over the rights and interests of the child, and neglected to give due attention, supervision, and supervision to the employees so that the child is healthy, such as emotional and physical stability, and thus, C and D, an infant care teacher, from October 23, 2014 to October 10:30 to 15:00, the victim F (n, 2 years of age) in the Suwon-si E apartment childcare center of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, for the reason that the cause cannot be known, and the victim’s head is humping and self-harm. However, C neglected the victim’s emotional abuse and protection by disregarding the victim’s body and salvbling the victim’s body twice and drinking at the lower time.

2. According to the records, “A child-care center” is a trade name of a child-care center operated by G, not a juristic person, but a private business entity. Thus, a public prosecution against Defendant A child-care center constitutes invalid in violation of the penal provisions, and thus, the public prosecutor stated that the Defendant indication is corrected from “A child-care center” to “G” because the public prosecutor’s indictment procedure constitutes invalid (the substantial Defendant is “G” and thus, the public prosecutor stated that the Defendant indication is corrected from “A child-care center,” but the records revealed as follows; i.e., the public prosecutor stated “A child-care center” in the indictment; and ii no investigation into G before prosecution was conducted, the public prosecutor cannot be deemed to have instituted a public prosecution against Defendant A’s child-care center pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act.