A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On March 2015, the Defendant: (a) 13:30 on March 2015, 2015, the Defendant was able to write down the victim’s head in his/her hand in the F stores in D 2st floor E (21 3, 300, 300) of the victim E (21 3,00) of the D 2nd floor; and (b) the victim did not want to do so.

Despite the fact that there has been a scarcity in the vicinity, it interfered with the victim's sale of Franchis by force by gathering the franchis in the floor and by gathering the franchis in the world, such as "in the inside D main," "in the inside," and neglecting the disturbance.

B. On April 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in a F store that works in D 2nd floor victim E (21 tax, female) located in Gangseo-si, Gangseo-si; (b) on April 1, 2015, the Defendant said that the victim does not want to do so.

However, without any reason, the victim's knifely knife the victim's knife by hand without any reason, and the victim interfered with the sale of the victim's Fresh goods by force by force, such as "the inside of the inside of the country, where he saw him to have fright the knife and fright the victim, and allowing him to flee."

(c)

On June 19, 2015, on the grounds that the Defendant was unable to know within the 2110 (Yancheon-dong) Gangseo-ro, Gangnam-si, Gangwon-do, 12:00, 2015, the Defendant spent a Si expense to customers of other banks, and on the ground that he was removed from the victim G (41) of the above bank employees G (41).

In recent years, it interfered with the victim's affairs concerning the management of banking affairs for about 15 minutes by force, such as taking a bath that "I will die."

(d)

On June 26, 2015, on the grounds that the Defendant was unable to know within the 11:45 Yung-ro 2110 (Gacheon-dong) Gangseo-ro Han-dong, the Defendant was able to incur a trial expense to the customers of other banks, and on the ground that the Defendant’s control was against the victim H (45) of the above bank employees of the said bank, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “Chewing, she for the same year of the opening, she for both years, and her two-years,” and talked with the victim by force for about 15 minutes by force.