The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are the same purport as the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence additionally submitted in the court of first instance was added, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate (the plaintiff in the court of first instance asserted that, at the time that the defendant connects the ship with the line on the right side of the vehicle of this case, the defendant connects it to the block by connecting the block by a separate power source located in the line on the right side of the vehicle of this case, instead of connecting the line to the line on the line on the right side of the vehicle of this case at the time of connecting the line, and there is no specific ground to deem that the defendant connects the ship of the aftermameras in the above manner, but the defendant has no connection with the ship of the aftermameras in the above manner). The reasons for this court's explanation are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The term "the period of acceptance by August 29, 2018" in the third 20th 20th 20th 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "two months during the ordinary period of acceptance by July 18, 2018."

The fifth 14-15 of the judgment of the court of the first instance is the location adjacent to the location of the Kameras, "in the vicinity of the Kameras, without passing through Furz". "In the vicinity of the location of the Mameras."

The 7th written judgment of the first instance court is "B" with ‘B' with ‘the third written judgment.

There is no evidence of the 7th written judgment of the first instance court. There is no evidence of the 9th written judgment.

The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant brought a box containing all electric wires of the instant vehicle, which was kept in HUnamdong Business Office on June 2018, and that the remainder was returned only after deducting the electric wires of black boxes, post-blucing cameras, light flag, and hosting.

However, it is difficult to recognize the evidence of Nos. 12 and 13 only by itself, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

In addition, the plaintiff's assertion is true.